Employee and Student Involvement in Classroom Decisions

Employee and Student Involvement in Classroom finalitysIntroductionEmployee readment plays an grave role in an judicature especi bothy to achieve an system of rules goals and objectivities. Due to manager limited with child(p) power to overhear the scoop finding completely, so employee exposeicipation in termination reservation sue is very substantial. Through this process it put up course way much diversity and infract solutions. So the same concept shadow be applies on m every(prenominal) other activities, non just for the organization or office closing reservation provided. For example, employee contact as well basin be apply to many daily activities such as classrooms activities that involve assimilators during the finish devising process. When there is schoolchild inter- collection talk in the ending fashioning process, it is knget as piece of musicicipative finale qualification.Student inter-group communication delineate as the degree to which learner influence how the stopping point is organized and carried forth. This provides opportunities to scholarly persons for sh atomic number 18 their knowledge and information between each other when they take part in end making. However, non-participative decisiveness making process still practically turn overs. It happen when students did not take part in the stopping point making process during classrooms activities. It means that these students might not scour know the existence of the conundrum or they argon not put on to provide any information, recommendations, allegiance in the classroom or whitethornbe the instructor did not want to discuss with the student when making the purpose.On the other side, student involvement tramp buoy be divided into three levels. At the worst level of student involvement, students allow for just provide the information when their instructors wait them. They do not make any recommendation and might not even kn ow what the fuss is ab erupt. At the medium level, students know the root word of problem and they go away make recommendations to instructor. At the highest level of student involvement, full(a) conclusion making process is handed over to students for them to crystallize it. These all can be summarized by the figure below.Those are the examples in the level of student involvement in both participative and non-participative decision making process. The high the rung on the ladder indicates that the higher level of student involvement in the decision making process. Although student involvement in decision making process has many advantages but it overly leads to rough electromotive force problems that might derive during the process.Problem acknowledgementIn this assignment, the main problem is focus to the explanation on how student involvement in classroom decisions typically do by the instructor alone might advance decision quality and the potence problems that whit ethorn occur in this process. ejaculate of ProblemsBased on the problem that has been identified, we entrust elaborate the source of problem according to the problems that may occur during the participative decision making process and also the problems that may occur during the non-participative decision making process. The explanation is do want that, in order to make a comparison between participative decision making and non-participative decision making. The purpose is to give a clear judgement on how student involvement in classroom decision typically made by the instructor alone might improve decision quality. Besides, this elaboration also can answer the second problem what authority problems that may occur in the participative decision making process.These are the potential problems that might occur during the participative decision making process seek of meshing at that place are two types of encounter undermine the benefits of the student involvement. First, the ne gate of root words. In participative decision making process, many students are involved. Different throng come out with contrasting ideas and opinion. So automatically it go away retrovert a lot of ideas, opinions and solutions. This provide easily leads to the conflict of ideas. Normally it is unexpressed to reach an agreement on the preferred solution. Second, the conflict between the student individual goal and the overall goal. Sometimes the student goals and the classroom goals will be different, thus it will happen conflict within that individual. This will prevent that student to give full contribution in the decision making process.Decision StructureDecision structure is the decision that made ground on the past draws. Usually the problem that happens in this station is the problem that is routine. It means that the problem had happened before and the solution has been identified in the past. Normally when this kind of problem occurs again, the standard procedure developed with a ready-made solution. So there is no need for the student involvement when making the decision since the instructor already know how to exercise it based on the past experience. wish of Sufficient KnowledgeSometimes students do not dedicate the knowledge that is needed to solve the problem. So even if they participate in the decision making process, they also cannot provide frequently function since they lack of sufficient knowledge.Decision CommitmentStudents are made up by variety of people. Some are very active, motivated and give a lot of commitment in the decision making process. However, some students are very inactive, not motivated and will not contribute in the decision making process.Fishbone (Source of Problem)Decision commitmentRisk of ConflictParticipative Decision MakingLack of sufficient knowledgeDecision structureOn the other side, these are the potential problems that might occur in the non-participative decision making process Power SharingThe will of the decision maker or the instructor to share the power with the students.Lack of AlternativesPeople collectively tend to be kick downstairs than individuals at generating and cream the best alternative because they present diverse perspectives and a broad mold of determine.Decision CommitmentSome students are unlikely to accept a decision made without their involvement, especially when the problem is related to them.Problem IdentificationSometime instructor alone fails to identify the problem accurately because students are usually the beginning(a) to know when the problem occurs.Mind-Map (Source of Problem)Learning OutcomesNowadays, western countries already practice classroom decision making rather than only take heed to the proofreaders and follow whatever the lecturers have limitd. Different people have different thought and one issue or questions may come out with various solutions. This will not happen if students ideas and creativity in decision making proc ess are being ignored or restricted. Therefore, end-to-end this classroom decision making, we can found out some scholarship outcomes which can benefit many parties. Of course, the most beneficial party will be students.By participating in classroom decision making process, students are becoming more mugwump, responsible, aggressive, and more confidence. These outcomes are wait oning them in their future workplace. In terms of independent, the students can become more independent in making their own decision rather than relying on lecturer to make decision. This also built up students confidence level as they need to be confidence with the decision they made and be responsible of the effect or result from the decision made.Furthermore, students may gain diverse useful information and experience from others through the communion of different decision making process especially in group assignments. This process is not only beneficial for the students themselves but also other s tudents. Throughout the process, others may absorb different way to make the correct decision or it might be efficient way to make a better decision. Therefore, the students involve less cost occur and yet student may develop their problem solving skills.By realizing the importance of the classroom decision making participation, students may also improve their communication skills. Among all the assignments or coursework, students may be required or encouraged to have it in a group or group for better decision making. By doing this, students are able to share their various decision among all the group members and decision can be made accurately throughout all the discussion that made by group members. This may come out with better results. Indirectly, students can realize that the importance of communication which playing an all important(p) role in every decision making process.Generate alternatives to solve the problemThe main problem can be solved by two alternatives. It is ea ch to implement participative decision making process in the classroom or non-participative decision making process.Choose alternative to solve the problemWe has chosen the participative decision making process instead of the non-participative decision making process. This is chosen based on the analysis that we have do on the potentials problems from both methods. In our opinion, participative decision making that involve student in it is better and more suitable equality to the non-participative decision making that made based on the instructor alone. When there are more people involved in the decision making process, there are a high number of outcomes. So the probability to leads to a better solution is getting higher. Furthermore, recently student in Colorado remarked, We can give you respect. We are able to understand the issues. We can think for ourselves. Its our education. If we have a say, it will make a difference. Based on that remarked phrase, we can see that nowadays students are prefers participative decision making more compare to non-participative.Besides that, we also can affects on the student behavior and values through participative decision making. If we want student to take responsibility for their own behavior and decision, we must first give them responsibility. Moreover student involvement in the decision making process will positively addition their commitment towards the decision that are make in the class either directly or indirectly.Involving student in the decision making process offers a number of advantages. First, it can identify and define the problems better. It is because students are the first one to know when something goes wrong. Other than that, it usually generates more and better solutions than the instructor working alone. Lastly, through student involvement, it is more likely to select the best option. People collectively tend to be better than individual alone when picking the best alternatives. This is because they have diverse perspectives and a broad representation of values. That is why we choose participative decision making instead of non-participative decision making.There are several ways to solve the potential problems that might occur during the participative decision making process. That is through Motivating student by rewardsUsually, the students of all time motivate by the reward given by lecturer. The reward can be consists of beneficiary reward and non-beneficiary reward. Beneficiary reward is given something to the students such as pen drive or other stationery. Meanwhile, the non-beneficiary reward is an intangible reward, and this type reward usually come from internal forces or nonverbal. The examples of non-beneficiary are give encouragement (e.g. well done, good job, etc.) Through reward, the students are more motivated to involve themselves in discussion and these can strengthen their commitment to the decision.Complexity of the problemStudent involvement is unnecess ary when the problem is routine. Instead, the benefits of the student involvement increase with the novelty and complexity of the problem or opportunity. set aside sufficient informationIf the student is lack of sufficient information, then the instructor should provide them some necessary information first for them before involving them into the participative decision making process.Level of involvementIf the student goals and norms conflict with the overall goals, then only a low level of student involvement is advisable. If the conflict of idea is likely, then high involvement would be difficult to achieve, so a low level of involvement is advisable.Team Reflection later completing this assignment, our group felt that it was a great learning experience for every member of the team. Throughout this assignment, we face many problems. Before we come out the assignment, we made a discussion to understand the question and also give the opinion about the answer individually. Therefore , communication is very important in this discussion. All of us have to learn how to cooperate in a team and respect different opinions. If there is a member of the team not willing to give their thought to the team members, it will not lead to a complete assignment. Every members opinion is very important in doing this assignment, so we make sure that everyone contributes ideas in running a team before we make the final decision.After that, we have to decide how to present creatively and effectively, who will go to present in previous of the class. We had to create a way of present that can attract the upkeep of the class to get a line in a limited time which is only 10 minutes for each group. Therefore, time management is very important in this assignment. We have to estimate the time for presentation and also make sure the slide show is interesting and informative that can caught upkeep of students to listen. Also, we have to make sure that the patron is very well in present ation which has the best English communication skills. Because our group consists of four members, indeed we have to separate the task to each of the member. The summarizing which is the most crucial part that needs to transmit clearly as this we will give the strongest presenter who had the best English communication skills to present. While the introduction and the definition will present by the other member. As a conclusion, this presentation gives a very good experience to every member and this can help members not to nervous when speaking in front of people. It can also improve member speaking skills in order to become more comfortable when speaking in front of people.Overall, we enjoyed doing this assignment. This is a great take exception for all of us where all members have to overcome those conflicts. Thus, it is a great team building experience for all the members as this can help everyone in future team oriented projects.ConclusionNowadays, many countries already practi ce classroom decision making rather than only listen to the lecturers and follow whatever the lecturers have decided. This kind of motivation can make us become more efficient when doing something.From this, we realize that it is importance for us to involve in the classroom decision making process. This is a sharing and learning process. Through participating in classroom decision making process, students are becoming more independent, responsible, aggressive, and more confidence. These outcomes are helping them in their future workplace. From participative decision making, we have the chance to absorb new idea from others. It provides us the sufficient knowledge for making the decision in future. Moreover, the students communication skill can be improved, which serve as a critical skill in our life.As a conclusion, the learning outcomes for this assignment have been achieved and all solutions for the potential problems had been identified. Although the participative decision maki ng process have some sort of potential problems, however, at overall it is still better than non-participative decision making.